Quantcast
Channel: Images RSS feed - Tank Lovers Group - Mod DB
Viewing all 1414 articles
Browse latest View live

M103 Heavy Tank

$
0
0
Like the contemporary British Conqueror tank, the M103 was designed to counter Soviet heavies such as the Josef Stalin tank or the T-10 if a conventional World War III broke out. Its long-ranged 120 mm cannon was designed to hit enemy tanks at extreme distances, but it was never used in combat. In 1953-1954 a series of 300 tanks, initially designated T43E1, were built by Chrysler at the Newark plant. Testing was unsatisfactory, and the tanks were all stored in August 1955. Only after recommending improvements, on 26 April 1956 the tank was standardized as the M103 Heavy Tank. Of the 300 T43E1s built, 80 went to the US Army (74 of which were rebuilt to M103 standard), and 220 were accepted by the US Marine Corps, to be used as infantry support, rebuilt to improved M103A1, then M103A2 standards.[2] The successive versions of the M103 shared many components with the M47 and M48 Patton tanks and the M60, which, with the exception of the M60 (a main battle tank) were all considered 90 mm gun (medium) tanks. Tracks, rollers and suspension elements were the same, with some modification to take into account the greater weight. The engine and transmission were never modified enough to give the extra power needed for the greater weight of the M103, and as a result, the tank was relatively underpowered and the drive systems were fragile. The turret of the M103 was larger than that of the M48 or the M60 to make room for the huge 120 mm gun and the two loaders assigned to it, in addition to the gunner and the commander. The driver sat in the hull. The gun was capable of elevation from +15 to -8 degrees. M103 Heavy Tank
Like the contemporary British Conqueror tank, the M103 was designed to counter Soviet heavies such as the Josef Stalin tank or the T-10 if a conventional World War III broke out. Its long-ranged 120 mm cannon was designed to hit enemy tanks at extreme distances, but it was never used in combat. In 1953-1954 a series of 300 tanks, initially designated T43E1, were built by Chrysler at the Newark plant. Testing was unsatisfactory, and the tanks were all stored in August 1955. Only after recommending improvements, on 26 April 1956 the tank was standardized as the M103 Heavy Tank. Of the 300 T43E1s built, 80 went to the US Army (74 of which were rebuilt to M103 standard), and 220 were accepted by the US Marine Corps, to be used as infantry support, rebuilt to improved M103A1, then M103A2 standards.[2] The successive versions of the M103 shared many components with the M47 and M48 Patton tanks and the M60, which, with the exception of the M60 (a main battle tank) were all considered 90 mm gun (medium) tanks. Tracks, rollers and suspension elements were the same, with some modification to take into account the greater weight. The engine and transmission were never modified enough to give the extra power needed for the greater weight of the M103, and as a result, the tank was relatively underpowered and the drive systems were fragile. The turret of the M103 was larger than that of the M48 or the M60 to make room for the huge 120 mm gun and the two loaders assigned to it, in addition to the gunner and the commander. The driver sat in the hull. The gun was capable of elevation from +15 to -8 degrees.

M103 Heavy Tank

$
0
0
Like the contemporary British Conqueror tank, the M103 was designed to counter Soviet heavies such as the Josef Stalin tank or the T-10 if a conventional World War III broke out. Its long-ranged 120 mm cannon was designed to hit enemy tanks at extreme distances, but it was never used in combat. In 1953-1954 a series of 300 tanks, initially designated T43E1, were built by Chrysler at the Newark plant. Testing was unsatisfactory, and the tanks were all stored in August 1955. Only after recommending improvements, on 26 April 1956 the tank was standardized as the M103 Heavy Tank. Of the 300 T43E1s built, 80 went to the US Army (74 of which were rebuilt to M103 standard), and 220 were accepted by the US Marine Corps, to be used as infantry support, rebuilt to improved M103A1, then M103A2 standards.[2] The successive versions of the M103 shared many components with the M47 and M48 Patton tanks and the M60, which, with the exception of the M60 (a main battle tank) were all considered 90 mm gun (medium) tanks. Tracks, rollers and suspension elements were the same, with some modification to take into account the greater weight. The engine and transmission were never modified enough to give the extra power needed for the greater weight of the M103, and as a result, the tank was relatively underpowered and the drive systems were fragile. The turret of the M103 was larger than that of the M48 or the M60 to make room for the huge 120 mm gun and the two loaders assigned to it, in addition to the gunner and the commander. The driver sat in the hull. The gun was capable of elevation from +15 to -8 degrees. M103 Heavy Tank
Like the contemporary British Conqueror tank, the M103 was designed to counter Soviet heavies such as the Josef Stalin tank or the T-10 if a conventional World War III broke out. Its long-ranged 120 mm cannon was designed to hit enemy tanks at extreme distances, but it was never used in combat. In 1953-1954 a series of 300 tanks, initially designated T43E1, were built by Chrysler at the Newark plant. Testing was unsatisfactory, and the tanks were all stored in August 1955. Only after recommending improvements, on 26 April 1956 the tank was standardized as the M103 Heavy Tank. Of the 300 T43E1s built, 80 went to the US Army (74 of which were rebuilt to M103 standard), and 220 were accepted by the US Marine Corps, to be used as infantry support, rebuilt to improved M103A1, then M103A2 standards.[2] The successive versions of the M103 shared many components with the M47 and M48 Patton tanks and the M60, which, with the exception of the M60 (a main battle tank) were all considered 90 mm gun (medium) tanks. Tracks, rollers and suspension elements were the same, with some modification to take into account the greater weight. The engine and transmission were never modified enough to give the extra power needed for the greater weight of the M103, and as a result, the tank was relatively underpowered and the drive systems were fragile. The turret of the M103 was larger than that of the M48 or the M60 to make room for the huge 120 mm gun and the two loaders assigned to it, in addition to the gunner and the commander. The driver sat in the hull. The gun was capable of elevation from +15 to -8 degrees.

Wot future tanks

$
0
0
tank icons found in hidden 8.0 Test files its quite old but i think some ppl didnt see thatWot future tanks
tank icons found in hidden 8.0 Test files its quite old but i think some ppl didnt see that

Object 477 "Hammer"

$
0
0
Object 477 "Molot" (Hammer) Developer: Kharkov KB at Kharkov Weight: 50 tons Crew: 3 Engine: 1500 hp Diesel 6TD Maximum Road Speed: 75 km/h Maximum Off-road Speed: 50 km/h Ground Pressure: 0.8 kg/m2 Main Gun: 152 mm 2A83 Ammunition: 34 rounds Auxiliary Armament: 7.62 mm Self-Protection Systems: Shtora-1, Arena Design work of the Object 477 next generation MBT with an unmanned turret began in 1981. Draft design was completed in 1984, technical design in 1985, and the first prototype (mock-up) was constructed in 1987. The vehicles were handed over to Russia, where trials continued through the 1990s. The Argus sight combines LLTV and imaging infrared channels, and a radar system is located on top of the turret. The crew is seated in the hull of the tank. The 152 mm gun with an autoloader can reach a rate of fire of 14 shots per minute. The basic loading module contains 10 rounds, and it can be supplemented by two 12 round modules. The Object 477 represents what was known as FST-2 in the West during the late 1980s/early 1990s. Object 477 "Hammer"
Object 477 "Molot" (Hammer) Developer: Kharkov KB at Kharkov Weight: 50 tons Crew: 3 Engine: 1500 hp Diesel 6TD Maximum Road Speed: 75 km/h Maximum Off-road Speed: 50 km/h Ground Pressure: 0.8 kg/m2 Main Gun: 152 mm 2A83 Ammunition: 34 rounds Auxiliary Armament: 7.62 mm Self-Protection Systems: Shtora-1, Arena Design work of the Object 477 next generation MBT with an unmanned turret began in 1981. Draft design was completed in 1984, technical design in 1985, and the first prototype (mock-up) was constructed in 1987. The vehicles were handed over to Russia, where trials continued through the 1990s. The Argus sight combines LLTV and imaging infrared channels, and a radar system is located on top of the turret. The crew is seated in the hull of the tank. The 152 mm gun with an autoloader can reach a rate of fire of 14 shots per minute. The basic loading module contains 10 rounds, and it can be supplemented by two 12 round modules. The Object 477 represents what was known as FST-2 in the West during the late 1980s/early 1990s.

Two awesome T-55 upgrades.

Two awesome T-55 upgrades.

Two awesome T-55 upgrades.

Two awesome T-55 upgrades.


Two awesome T-55 upgrades.

Two awesome T-55 upgrades.

Merkava MK.IIID Dor-Dalet

$
0
0
The last generation of the Merkavas Mark III class was the Mark IIID Dor-Dalet (Hebrew: Fourth Generation), which included several components as prototypes to be introduced in the Mark IV.Merkava MK.IIID Dor-Dalet
The last generation of the Merkavas Mark III class was the Mark IIID Dor-Dalet (Hebrew: Fourth Generation), which included several components as prototypes to be introduced in the Mark IV.

BTMP-84

$
0
0
Taking into account the need for increased protection of tracked armoured infantry fighting vehicles whose armour has fallen well behind that of the tanks with which they are expected to co-operate, the KMDB has developed a heavy infantry fighting vehicle under the designation BTMP-84. The BTMP-84 is intended to carry out all types of tactical operations in interaction with battle tanks. The vehicle provides the mechanised infantry units with the mobility, protection and firepower equal to those of tank units. The BTMP-84 is based on the chassis of the T-84 main battle tank. This retains the two-person turret armed with a 125mm gun fed by an automatic loader. The specific feature of the vehicle design is that there is a troop compartment for five infantry soldiers. A door at the rear of the vehicle opens to the left, steps fold downwards and the hatch above this is raised to allow the troops to rapidly leave the vehicle. A firing port is provided in either side of the troop compartment, as are roof hatches.BTMP-84
Taking into account the need for increased protection of tracked armoured infantry fighting vehicles whose armour has fallen well behind that of the tanks with which they are expected to co-operate, the KMDB has developed a heavy infantry fighting vehicle under the designation BTMP-84. The BTMP-84 is intended to carry out all types of tactical operations in interaction with battle tanks. The vehicle provides the mechanised infantry units with the mobility, protection and firepower equal to those of tank units. The BTMP-84 is based on the chassis of the T-84 main battle tank. This retains the two-person turret armed with a 125mm gun fed by an automatic loader. The specific feature of the vehicle design is that there is a troop compartment for five infantry soldiers. A door at the rear of the vehicle opens to the left, steps fold downwards and the hatch above this is raised to allow the troops to rapidly leave the vehicle. A firing port is provided in either side of the troop compartment, as are roof hatches.

Beautiful Picture

$
0
0
Last days of the war coming to an end...Beautiful Picture
Last days of the war coming to an end...

M3 Lee

$
0
0
Rare depiction of an American M3 Lee in the hands of the Soviet forces. "For Stalin" is written on the side armor. It was largely unpopular in the Red Army for all reasons imaginable: high profile, weak armor, slow traction and a large crew of 6. By the time these tanks arrived in the USSR in late 1942, the 75mm gun was also obsolete.M3 Lee
Rare depiction of an American M3 Lee in the hands of the Soviet forces. "For Stalin" is written on the side armor. It was largely unpopular in the Red Army for all reasons imaginable: high profile, weak armor, slow traction and a large crew of 6. By the time these tanks arrived in the USSR in late 1942, the 75mm gun was also obsolete.

Tank concepts

$
0
0
Made by kitbashing stuff found in wolfsshipyard.com. I call the first one the MBT-90 "Hammer" The second one MBT-120 "Rhino" Comments? Tank concepts
Made by kitbashing stuff found in wolfsshipyard.com. I call the first one the MBT-90 "Hammer" The second one MBT-120 "Rhino" Comments?

Russian KT-40 Flying Light Tank Glider

MOW Tank's

$
0
0
Screenshot taken by: Descent Gamer Posted by: Descent GamerMOW Tank's
Screenshot taken by: Descent Gamer Posted by: Descent Gamer

The "Brand New" Chinese Tree In WoT...

$
0
0
It sure is overflowing with originality... Coming in 8.2.The "Brand New" Chinese Tree In WoT...
It sure is overflowing with originality... Coming in 8.2.

Khoramshahr Tank

$
0
0
Iran's possible upgrade package for their T-72s.Khoramshahr Tank
Iran's possible upgrade package for their T-72s.

Khoramshahr Tank

$
0
0
Iran's possible upgrade package for their T-72s.Khoramshahr Tank
Iran's possible upgrade package for their T-72s.
Viewing all 1414 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>